Clean bathroom fixtures and a tidy kitchen are not the only way to gauge a home's health index. As a teen I spent a great deal of time around a friend's home that onlookers would have sworn had a revolving front door. Set in a college town, that little house thrummed with the activity of older siblings coming and going, career parents on the run and a bevy of student boarders from all over the world calling it home. There was rarely a bare square inch of counter space in the kitchen for all the dishes that constantly needed washing, the laundry machines were never still and there was the subtle but continuous jockeying for an available bathroom.
They had a professional cleaning lady of sorts who gave the place little more than a lick and a promise once a week. You could not tell much more than six hours later if she had been there or not. The amazing thing I now recall from the years that I observed and participated in that milling microcosm, is that there was never a sick person among us, never more than a mild dose of the sniffles. Above the nearly always full kitchen sink, there hung a framed motto: "Our home is clean enough to be healthy and dirty enough to be happy."
Scientists are now offering a good deal of support to this healthy home philosophy, giving academic credibility to the thinking that generations of homemakers have intuitively relied on to save their sanity. According to the "hygiene hypothesis", a certain skimming of bacteria and viruses in our everyday environments can be very beneficial, in fact even necessary in order to not compromise our immune systems. Ironically, this pro-germ thinking is coming to the forefront just when body soaps, laundry detergents and household cleansers infused with antibacterial chemicals have conquered supermarket shelves and invaded household cabinets. Latex gloves and protective masks are not that difficult to find in many homes either. Of course, it is precisely this hyperconscious cleanliness that helped precipitate the hypothesis.
The hygiene hypothesis contends that if during early childhood, an environment does not provide exposure to particular infectious microorganisms, an individual's immune system will be deprived of a valuable education. The expansive term "bacterial lipopolysaccharides", refers to a bacterial module that acts as the immune system's educator, stimulating certain immune system cells into protective action. Simplistically put, the hygiene hypothesis suggests that our increasing fixation with antibacterial sprays, wipes and soaps is removing too many of these important bacterial modules that need to be present to trigger the child's antibodies into developing.
Even as the national angst about stocking up on latex gloves and protective masks builds in anticipation of H1N1 and other maladies, there is a slowly growing movement of mothers across the country who are consciously encouraging their kids to play in what they call 'healthy dirt'. They then refuse to use antibacterial soaps when cleaning the children up afterwards. They recognize that regular soap and a good scrubbing is still a reliable way reduce bacteria counts to healthily manageable amounts that allow most people's immune systems to function optimally.
Ironically, locating a soap in the grocery or drug store that does not have an antibacterial label is not such an easy task anymore, but it is very likely worth the search. The axiom "clean enough to be healthy, dirty enough to be happy" is something we should keep in mind the next time we ponder which cleansing products to buy.
Posted under Allergies
This post was written by Shelby Morrison on September 26, 2009
